Publication Type:
Journal ArticleSource:
Entropy, Volume Vol 5 (2003)URL:
http://www.mdpi.org/entropy/papers/e5020088.pdfKeywords:
cybernetics, cybersemiotics, information, semioticsAbstract:
<div>
It is argued that a true transdisciplinary information science going from physical</div>
<div>
information to phenomenological understanding needs a metaphysical framework. Three</div>
<div>
different kinds of causality are implied: efficient, formal and final. And at least five</div>
<div>
different levels of existence are needed: 1. The quantum vacuum fields with entangled</div>
<div>
causation. 2. The physical level with is energy and force-based efficient causation. 3. The</div>
<div>
informational-chemical level with its formal causation based on pattern fitting. 4. The</div>
<div>
biological-semiotic level with its non-conscious final causation and 5. The social-linguistic</div>
<div>
level of self-consciousness with its conscious goal-oriented final causation. To integrate</div>
<div>
these consistently in an evolutionary theory as emergent levels, neither mechanical</div>
<div>
determinism nor complexity theory are sufficient because they cannot be a foundation for a</div>
<div>
theory of lived meaning. C. S. Peirce’s triadic semiotic philosophy combined with a</div>
<div>
cybernetic and systemic view, like N. Luhmann’s, could create the framework I call</div>
<div>
Cybersemiotics. </div>